The Life of Selena Essay Example For Students

The Life of Selena Essay The Life of SelenaSelena was born in 1971 in Lake Jackson, Texas. She was also raised and went to school in Lake Jackson, Texas. By the year 1975, Selena had begun to sing, and with the help of her father she formed her own band. They were called â€Å"Selena Y Los Dinos†. During that time of year, Selena Y Los Dinos made their first recording. Selena had no time for dating because of all of her tours. However, she fell in love with the guitarist from her band. His name is Christopher Perez. In 1992, Selena and Christopher got married. Selena became a very famous singer. In 1993, she held her first Mexican Press Conference in Monterrey Mexico. During the year 1993, she also had her own line of clothing and she opened her own clothing store by the name of â€Å"Selena etc. Boutique†. Selena became so famous that in the year 1994 she received a Double Platinum award for her album â€Å"Selena Live†, and she also received a Quadruple Platinum award for her album â⠂¬Å"Amor Prohibido†. â€Å"Amor Prohibido† reached the #1 song on the Billboard Latin Chart. Also in the year 1994, â€Å"Selena Live† won a Grammy for the Best Mexican-American Album. We will write a custom essay on The Life of Selena specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Selena had a record-braking crowd of more than 61,000 fans when she performed at the Houston Astrodome in the year 1995. During that year, she also recorded her crossover album â€Å"Dreaming of You†.After so much success in her life at such an early age, Selena was shot and killed by her own associate Yolanda Saldivar on March 31, 1995.

How to be a good manager essays

How to be a good manager essays Manager is a person who is responsible for everything in the organization where s/he works. In my opinion, being a good manager should have many points. First, manager should have good character. It means that being a manager must be kind and gentle with employees. However, S/he should not think that s/he doesnt need to obey or listen to what his or her employees said. Patience and respecting to employees is a good way to manage them well. Second, s/he must have not only good character but also flexibility in work as well. It means that s/he has capacity to work or solve either the problem or the conflict that will happen to the organization or his or her staff. To make a good decision, s/he must have high knowledge or experience with it. For example, s/he has just created new policy for employee, and it is said about the reduction of per diem for staff to the province. Then staffs make complaint with new policy. Good manager must be flexible to solve this problem and has ability to make their staff calm or please with new policy by telling them good reason. Moreover, manager should also have management background. S/he must be a person who has quality in work. Furthermore, s/he knows how to improve productivity and revenue and motivate staffs to work hard. All of those are the important factors to make the organization work well and doesnt turn to bankruptcy. Also, s/he should know well about management circle. S/he must know well about planning, organizing, controlling, and leading. To sum up, being a good manager should contain good character, flexibility in work, and skillfulness. I think that the organization will work well if manager has those points in fulfilling his or her work. It is good not only for organization but also for manager himself or herself. ...

Write an analytical essay about Orientalism and the Other

Write an analytical about Orientalism and the Other - Essay Example The article is well organized, first telling the reader what might be expected and then proceeding to discuss each of these items in turn. This helps to improve his argument because it seems straightforward. In his discussion regarding the ideas of Orientalism, for example, he traces the way in which social scientists have gradually become more aware of how their own culture colors perceptions of various elements of other cultures and their language reinforces the East/West dichotomies that foster continued flawed perception. His analysis of the writings of Max Weber regarding the Orient reveals exactly what he means when he says the very vocabulary of the sciences are guilty of reflecting the Orientalist approach. â€Å"He [Weber] contrasted the ‘sensual’ East with the ‘rational’ West, where denial of luxury was upheld by the Protestant church.† From this understanding of Weber’s focus, he then moves forward to trace this thought through the history of Orientalist criticism. â€Å"The first stage developed in the late 1950s and early 60s as Oriental Studies departments in the US, USSR and UK were reorganized,† while the second stage started with protests published by individuals from within the ‘oriental’ culture primarily championed by Abdel-Malek in the 60s and 70s. The third stage of this aspect of social theory development is identified by Walker as being the publication of Edward Said’s book Orientalism. Throughout, he demonstrates how the ideas of Marxism were frequently adopted by these critics as a means of overcoming some of the more glaring issues. As this discussion progresses, Walker manages to also demonstrate how the language itself poses a problem through asides such as â€Å"The terms ‘Third World’ and ‘non-Western’ are both culturally loaded and s uggest a dichotomy were there is, increasingly, not one.† This aspect of the